In my opinion, the massive stock selling in China, which has
garnered much less media attention than the Greek drama is the more serious
situation. The People’s Bank of China have cut rates and lowered bank reserve
requirements to provide support for the stock market that can’t seem to catch a
bid.
For the past year, folks have been trading Chinese markets
like day traders and the volatility is astonishing for a stock index. Both the
Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges more than doubled in a less than a year
and both are now off their highs and in bear market territory in a blink of
an eye. This precipitous sell-off is cause for concern and the speculative
“risk-off” trading demeanor does have the potential to spread to other markets.
That said, the Chinese regulators are throwing
everything at the market in order to prove a floor. Aside from the rates cuts and lowered reserve
requirements, “The securities regulator
relaxed rules on margin financing, making it easier for investors to borrow
cash to buy shares and reducing pressure on brokers to call in collateral. The
government announced that state pension funds would allocate more cash to the
stockmarket. Official media, playing the cheerleader as ever, talked up
blue-chip stocks. It did not work: rather than boosting confidence, the series
of moves carried a whiff of desperation. The market tumbled nearly 10% on
Thursday and Friday.”
But wait, there’s more. According to a Bloomberg
report via Business Insider, “According
to a Bloomberg report on Saturday, officials are suspending Initial Public
Offerings (IPOs) – as many as 28 on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges –
to deal with the tumble in stocks. Stopping new companies from going public in
IPOs may reduce the flow of cash from existing stocks, Bloomberg notes. There
was no information on how long this ban would last.”
That should be enough to quell market jitters right?
Another recent report out of Business
Insider, “China's top 21 securities
brokerages said on Saturday that they would collectively invest at least 120
billion yuan ($19.3 billion to help stabilize the country's stock markets after
a slump of nearly 30 percent since mid-June.”
Surely stepping up efforts to support the world’s second
largest economy’s stock market from cratering is a noble effort. If the growth
in China falters then there will be global repercussions and that could be the
spark that ignites the coming market correction.
Now this morning in Business
Insider I read, “But now Chinese
companies have decided to take matters into their own hands and they just found
a better and easier solution — suspend the company's stocks from being traded
at all. According to China's official financial news outlet The Securities
Times, picked up by the Financial Times and Reuters, more than 200 companies
just suspended their shares. This brings the total amount of shares suspended
to 651 since June 29, which is worth 23% of the 2,808 companies listed on the
Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges.”
Added to that, “According
to Xinhua,
a daily trading limit for the CSI 500 index will be effective from Tuesday, the
latest action by China’s financial regulators to prevent more losses. Overnight
China’s financial futures exchange said it would limit investors’ daily
purchases of CSI 500 index futures to 1,200 lots for rise and fall.”
That makes sense. When trying to stop the stock market from
selling-off…stop all the market participants from selling. Of all the central
banking financial engineering that we have seen over the past several years,
the actions taking place in China is the most astonishing display of moral
hazard yet. The attempts to shackle the invisible hand are on full display and
it is this humble investors opinion that all these efforts will fail. It would
be an excellent lesson in macroeconomics if the world’s second largest economy
didn’t face economic, financial and social upheaval.
That said, we believe China offers wonderful long-term
investment prospects. Admittedly it cannot sustain the published 7% to 8%
economic growth over the long-term but a more moderate 3% to 4% for the Chinese
economy is still impressive and worth looking at through all this near-term
volatility and market turmoil.
For full disclosure, as part of our 3Q14 Global Equity
Program rebalancing, we added the iShares China ETF (MCHI) to our managed
accounts program near $46 per share. While the position is still up 15%, we are
starting to question its value-add prospects to the portfolio. The position is
very small relative to the program portfolio but it may not make the cut at the
next rebalancing. When looking at the daily and weekly charts we find the ETF
is sitting near critical levels and may be near-term over sold.
Bottom Line: The
near-term prospects may provide a bounce in the ETF but ultimately we believe
there is little centralized regulation can do to stem a market correction. More
importantly is the long-term concerns on the economic and financial stability
in China. As such a key driver of global economic growth, a major economic,
financial and social upheaval in China is enough to start the correction in
U.S. equities that so many are talking about.
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written permission of Squared Concept Partners, LLC. Any information presented in this report is for informational purposes only. All opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice. Squared Concept Partners, LLC is an independent asset management and consulting company. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies discussed. In some cases, these positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular report.
The above information should not be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein. The publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information. The owners of Squared Concept Partners, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s research ideas. They also may hold positions contrary to the ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.
This analysis should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for the readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written without consideration to the readers’ risk and return profile nor has the readers’ liquidity needs, time horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences been taken into account. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
No comments:
Post a Comment