Monday, April 18, 2016

Summer Trading Roadmap


The market’s obsession with the inner workings of central bank policy continues. The latest figures place the probability of a rate hike at the end of this month at 0%. The probability is less than 30% for a hike in June and July. It’s only until we reach the end of the year (December 2016) and the start of next year (January 2017) that the probability of a hike exceeds 50%.




The Fed’s dual mandate of steady employment and prices remain but has recently become a bit muddy as Chair Yellen has been basing monetary policy decisions on unorthodox objectives. Year-over-year nonfarm payrolls have been growing slightly above average over the past several years.






Inflation expectations have been quite low but have risen recently. US Core PCE (seasonally adjusted) has started trending higher and inflation expectation as measured by the risk premium between 10 year TIPS and 10 year government yields confirms the move. In fact, inflation expectations are coming off the lowest levels since 2010.







The question remains what is keeping the Fed so dovish and when will they have the confidence to start to take a more aggressive stance towards tightening.

While the employment picture seems to be in-line with what the Fed hopes to achieve and most likely price stabilization is running slightly below target levels, the US and world economies continue to struggle and perhaps the Fed lacks conviction of the US economy to withstand additional tightening. While true the global stock markets have recovered from the furious bout of volatility from earlier in the year, oil prices have staged a recovery and China concerns have once again subsided, we are not out of the weeds just yet. The International Monetary Fund just downgraded global economic growth again citing concerns about strife in the Middle East, European refugee concerns, the possibility of a British departure from the EU and anti-trade sentiment that has stemmed from our political process. The rapid rise of the Japanese Yen (we were bullish on the Yen in our March 7th blog note) has splashed cold water on the Japanese economy in spite of moving to negative interest rates.
First quarter economic growth for the US according to GDPNow, the Atlanta Fed forecasting model that has been spot on recently shows the US economy growing an anemic 0.3% in 1Q16. This is compared to just less than 1.5% growth based on economist forecasts.





Indeed the economic analysis coming from the XE Blog (they do a great job at tracking all things economic) states, “This week’s two primary releases were coincident economic indicators that showed a slowing consumer and industrial sector.  Neither development is encouraging as we begin the second quarter and both are likely culprits for the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model’s decline to a .3% 1Q16 growth rate…With the LEIs barely rising and much slower rate of growth for the CEIs, it’s doubtful we’ll see stronger much growth in 2Q.”    

Additional pressure on the global economic front comes from the non-oil export figures out of Singapore. This country is considered to be a good barometer for global growth as it has multiple trading partners in the Pacific Rim. This morning Business Insider reported, “As a global barometer for the health of the global economy, Singapore continues to paint a bleak picture at present.
Not only did its economy fail to grow in the first three months of the year, demand for the nation’s exports is now also plummeting.
According to International Enterprise (IE), non-oil exports (NODX) from the country fell by 15.6% in the 12 months to March, missing already dire forecasts for a contraction of 13.2%.
The annual contraction was the steepest recorded since February 2013 and well below the 2.0% annual gain previously recorded in February.”





“Although the data is volatile, exports have now contracted on an annualised basis in three of the past four months. As a major global trade hub, the continued weakness in exports suggests global demand remains weak, underscoring concerns from the IMF and others that global economic growth may once again undershoot expectations in 2016.”

The economic picture in our view doesn’t warrant new highs in the stock market and yet the market continues to climb. This leads us to believe that the market is moving higher on the tenets of additional monetary stimulus (or a departure from a tightening stance for the Fed) and a bout of short covering. Take that with drastically reduced corporate earnings and revenues and we have potential problems on the horizon. Not the greatest recipe for a sustained market rally.
Other concerns that may hinder the Fed from further tightening was brought to light from Deutsche Bank's chief US economist, Joe LaVorgna (via Business Insider). To summarize his points, here are the meeting dates and additional reasons the Fed may stay its hand.
4/27/16 meeting – No rate increase due to slowing 1Q16 economic growth.
6/15/16 meeting – No rate increase due to sub-par 2Q16 economic growth and the volatility arising from the Brexit situation (that meeting happens on June 23).
7/27/16 meeting – No rate hike because it coincides with the Democratic National Convention (July 25-28) and is only a few days after the Republican National Convention (July 18-21).
9/21/16 meeting – No hike due to the proximity of the US general Presidential election.
11/2/16 meeting - No hike due to the proximity of the US general Presidential election.
12/14/16 meeting – This would be the earliest the Fed could hike if it were at all concerned about the above factors. It appears based on the Fed implied probabilities that the market is expecting something similar to the above scenario pending some obscure bout of growth or inflation.
Surprise Fed Action
If we toss fundamentals aside temporarily and assume the market will be dictated by monetary policy, at least temporarily then a surprisingly hawkish Fed statement or unanticipated move in rates could have some fairly dire consequences. We believe the market has currently prices in an increasingly dovish Fed which is expected given the state of the global economic environment.
Investment Grade Bonds
On the daily chart, investment grade bonds have seen a fairly parabolic move this year as the Fed softened its stance. The chart for LQD (IG bond ETF) has had a strong move to the upside but we are starting to see some negative bearish divergences between prices and the oscillators and MACD. A hawkish Fed tone can bring this ETF lower. The LQD weekly chart looks equally extended and is probably due for a pullback or at the very least a consolidation period. The LQD monthly chart also shows several bearish divergences as new highs in the index are met by lower highs in the technical readings. Fed action counter to market expectations could mean trouble for the sector.  







High Yield Bonds

We are seeing bearish divergences all over the high yield bond market. We are tracking this sector using the iShares High Yield ETF (HYG). This sector has also seen big moves from its lows earlier in the year and surprising central bank action will take its toll here as well. We are concerned about these bearish divergences because high yield prices move very closely with US stocks. The five year correlation coefficient between HYG and SPX (S&P 500) is greater than 90%. More recently in the past twelve months that relationship has come down to roughly 76% as prices between high yield bonds and stock prices have diverged. We pointed out in previous writings that when these divergences have occurred (stocks outperforming high yield bonds) it has usually coincided with stock market corrections and in extreme cases bear markets.
On a weekly basis, the high yield ETF is largely overbought but remains in its downward channel. The recent parabolic rally came on lower volume.






US Equities

On the daily chart the S&P 500 remains in its downward channel despite the recent rally. The sugar rush from last week’s announcement of an oil production freeze will be short lived in our opinion and isn’t a strong enough catalysts to change our view. Economic growth and corporate earnings don’t support current valuation levels in our view. The best chance we have of continuing the rally to new highs will be excessively dovish Fed action. We are seeing some potentially bearish divergences on the chart. Given the technical picture as well as the earnings and economic fundamentals, we are still expecting a rather rough and volatile summer market.
The weekly SPX chart shows an over-extended market that still resides in a downward channel. The monthly chart has improved a bit but far from ideal. Similar to the start of the last two bear markets, RSI (14) has dipped below 50 but this time around it has retaken that level. That is a good sign. There has been a MACD bearish cross, but that negative momentum has subsided somewhat. Prices broke the 20-month moving average to the downside and the slope of the 20MMA turned negative. We have recently retaken the 20-month average and it is sloping higher again. If these metrics start to fail once again and the US economic and corporate earnings picture doesn’t improve, we could see the S&P 500 fall all the way to 1600 (which is the 38.2% Fibonacci level off the 2009 bottom. Perhaps another round of QE or negative interest rate policy by the Fed would save the day to avoid these levels







US Dollar

The US dollar has priced in the new dovish Fed. It has been in a clear down channel recently but downside momentum has been waning. We think it could drop back to the 93.5 level based on the daily chart. If this level holds as support again it could offer another trading opportunity. On the weekly chart the US dollar is oversold and approaching a key support level at around 93.5. If this level holds again it would offer a trading opportunity and if the Fed makes an unexpected hawkish move, we could see the US dollar break the 100 level to the upside. The monthly chart shows positive momentum for the dollar and would act as support for the coming trade near 93.5.







Japanese Yen

Clearly the rise in the Yen has frustrated Japanese policy makers. Excessive quantitative easing and zero interest rate policies haven’t stopped the Yen advance. This would most likely increase the chances of additional Bank of Japan intervention although feedback from the recent G20 meeting indicates a lack of cooperation from other central banks and policy makers. From Business Insider, “Japan's efforts to seek informal consent to act against an unwelcome yen rise bore little fruit, with the United States offering a cool response to concerns voiced by Tokyo that the currency's gains are too sharp and may justify intervention.
A lack of G20 sympathy for Tokyo's appeal may embolden yen bulls to test the currency's 17-month highs against the dollar hit earlier this month, keeping Japanese policymakers on edge to contain the damage on a fragile, export-reliant economy… In a communique issued on Friday, the G20 finance leaders maintained a warning on countries to refrain from competitive currency devaluation and signaled that markets have calmed from the past few months of turbulence.
The G20 also reiterated that excess currency volatility was undesirable, but only after heavy lobbying by Japanese delegates who want to use the language to justify stepping into the market if they see yen gains as excessive.
Tokyo won't be engaging in competitive currency devaluation as long as any yen-selling intervention is brief and aimed at smoothing abrupt yen rises, a senior Japanese finance ministry official told reporters after the G20 gatherings.”
They go on to cite, “the government may lean on the Bank of Japan to deploy another blow of monetary stimulus as early as its next rate review on April 27-28.
BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda waded into the currency debate to describe past yen rises as "excessive," and reiterated his pledge to take additional monetary easing steps if yen moves hurt the economy.
While many BOJ officials are wary of acting again so soon after having deployed negative interest rates in January, Kuroda may be ready to pull the trigger, some analysts say.
U.S. economist Nouriel Roubini, who claims to have spoken to Japanese central bankers, signaled on Friday the BOJ may be nervous enough about the yen's rise to ease even before the April meeting.”
On the daily Yen chart, we are seeing some possible bearish divergences off its most recent rally and a near-term pullback could be in order. Momentum has been very strong on the weekly chart but we are approaching levels that would coincide with government intervention, at least temporarily. On the monthly chart we are seeing many bullish signs. RSI (14) has risen back above 50 coincided with a bullish MACD cross. In previous instances this has occurred prior to major upward moves in the currency and usually during periods of US stock market turmoil. A long position in the Yen could provide cover if we get a major stock market sell-off this summer. We could see a short-term pullback but longer-term optimism.
The oil production freeze negotiations out of Doha this weekend have broken down driving oil prices lower and providing a boost for the Yen. From Bloomberg, “The lack of agreement at Doha highlights the deep divisions between OPEC members, and importantly, within Saudi Arabia, said Robert Rennie, the global head of currency and commodity strategy at Westpac Banking Corp. in Sydney. The Aussie should hold support from about 75.75 cents to 76 cents at least through the next day or so, he said.
The yen appreciated 0.3 percent to 108.41 per dollar. Earlier it touched 107.77, approaching the 107.63 level reached on April 11, the strongest since October 2014.”








The Yen remains a crowded long as reported by Bloomberg. “Hedge funds and other large speculators have never been more bullish on the yen.

 
Positions that benefit from gains by Japan’s currency exceeded those that benefit from losses by a net 66,190 contracts in the week ended April 12, a report from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission showed Friday. That’s the most in data going back to 1992.”





Gold

In the latest Commitment of Traders report for gold, we are seeing a fairly crowded long speculative trade while commercial contracts show the users of gold are locking in prices at current levels, an indication that gold could head lower. From Seeking Alpha, “In the latest Commitment of Traders report (COT), we saw a week where speculative gold longs increased their positions while speculative gold shorts slightly decreased their positions. Speculative gold longs stand at over 200,000 contracts, which is the highest since August of 2011 - when the gold price achieved its all-time high. Additionally, commercial gold traders (bullion banks, producers, retailers, etc.) increased their short position to the highest since February of 2013.”
“This week's report shows a large increase in speculative longs with speculative shorts slightly decreasing their positions.”






“As is clear in the table above, speculative positioning significantly favors the long side as speculative longs now hold 214,349 contracts versus the speculative shorts at 30,131 contracts.

This is the highest nominal speculative long position since August of 2011!”






“The yellow line in the table above is the all-time COT report high for the gold price at $1,895 per ounce. The big difference, though, is that currently we have around 30,000 speculative traders short gold, while in 2011, that was fewer than 5,000 contracts short - so even though we've hit nominal speculative long highs, the percentage of shorts is still much higher now and that means there could be room to grow.

Finally, when we take a look at commercial traders (bullion banks, miners/producers, large merchants, etc.), we see that they have significantly increased their short positions.”





“They have essentially doubled their short positions into this gold rally, and their current short position of over 194,000 contracts represents the biggest short position these entities have held since February of 2013. Of course, when it comes to the COT report there are always two sides to the trade as no short can be established without a corresponding long and vice versa, but the fact that many of the traders actually involved in the physical gold world are willing to take the other side of the gold trade should at least make investors cautious.”

The daily gold chart (GLD) shows the big move for this year and we appear to be in a consolidation phase. A trade may happen with a breakout from the downward channel and selling pressure could on a breakdown could be temporarily exacerbated by the crowded long. Momentum is clearly improving but we’d be inclined to listen to what the commercial traders are saying in their trading action.
On the weekly and monthly chart it seems we have snapped a downtrend that has haunted the metal for some time.







Bottom Line

I’m not one to sell in May and go away so I want to collect my thoughts on how this summer could play out. It’s impossible to predict the future of capital market moves but we are preparing for likely a direction based on specific events.
One key item will be the Brexit vote in June. A vote in favor of a British exit from the EU could cause some major summer volatility. If this occurs along with a decelerating economic picture and a dovish Fed, we’d be inclined to be long gold, Yen and treasuries and short US dollar, equities and high yield bonds.
If the economic picture starts to improve heading into the second half of the year, the Fed takes a more hawkish stance and the Brexit vote results in a no result for exiting the EU we would take the opposite positions.
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
Email: joe@squaredconcept.com
Twitter: @jskalinowski
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JoeKalinowskiCFA/
Blog: http://squaredconcept.blogspot.com/
 
Additional Reading
 
No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written permission of Squared Concept Partners, LLC.  Any information presented in this report is for informational purposes only.  All opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice.  Squared Concept Partners, LLC is an independent asset management and consulting company. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies discussed.  In some cases, these positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular report.  
 
The above information should not be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein.  The publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information.  The owners of Squared Concept Partners, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s research ideas.  They also may hold positions contrary to the ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.
 
This analysis should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for the readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written without consideration to the readers’ risk and return profile nor has the readers’ liquidity needs, time horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences been taken into account. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.






Monday, April 4, 2016

Bulls On Parade


I’ll start this blog off with a few announcements. Squared Concept is officially a Registered Investment Advisory firm. Our goal is to work with other RIA’s, family offices and advisors to offer our products as a compliment to their existing strategies. We are working with a marketing firm now to fine tune our message and we will have an update on that soon. As such, we have new compliance requirements that must be upheld including incorporating this blog site into our procedures. Over the next few weeks we will have a new look and feel to this site so please stay tuned.

I am also studying for the Charted Market Technician level I exam at the end of this month. So between our compliance review and the studying this month will probably be a bit lean on the postings. We will be up and running full time shortly though.

1Q16 Portfolio Results.

We finished the first quarter down -0.9%. We underperformed the S&P 500 which finished the quarter up 1.3% but edged out the Nasdaq Comp which was lower by -2.4%. Since inception (July 2015) we are up 19.4% vs. -1.1% for the S&P 500. We are also beating the Nasdaq Comp which is down -4.9% since July.

January and February were strong months for us as we were prepared for the sell-off and subsequent rebound and were on the right side of the tape for most of the first two months of the year. March proved quite challenging as we started to fade the rally way too early. Upon the statements made by Mario Draghi at the ECB the market rally and subsequent sell-off later that day swayed us to close our long bias and start building positions counter to the bullish rally. Later in the month Janet Yellen added fuel to the bullish run by coming out much more dovish than we expected. The market ran further and by this time we were behind the eight ball with nothing more to do than stem our losses for the month.

In the future we will wait for additional confirmation of the trend before scaling in. Case in point, the brief sell-offs that we were watching happened with very little volume and not enough panic. Outside of Central Banking activity there were no major catalysts to warrant a greater sell-off i.e. oil prices hitting new lows, Chinese market turmoil or a European debt crisis. U.S. economic data was also improving a bit. We will also be more measured in our approach to building positions so as not to be too overexposed at the beginning of a perceived trend change. The stock market is forever a humbling experience and we are always learning from it. 

Bulls on Parade

The bulls still seem to be in control. We will continue to stay exposed to the long side of the market until such time that the supply / demand dynamic shifts. Even Friday, with the markets dropping in the morning the bulls came out to rally on the day.

That said we are still concerned by the current levels and are preparing for another pullback in the market. On the SPX daily chart RSI and Stochastics are pointing to overbought levels. Like most oscillators with finite bounds, they tend to break down in a strongly trending market so we have been at these levels for quite some time. We will be watching for sharp downward movements in the oscillators. We are also approaching the top of the trend line since the market started reaching lower highs and lows. This is an important level for us to watch. Failure to break this trend line to the upside could bring a nasty sell-off. MACD momentum has been waning even as the market has continued higher. This doesn’t bode well for the near term picture in our opinion.

SPX equal weight has not been rallying with the index so it seems we are back to the notion of the index being supported by a handful of the largest companies in the index. This could lead to potential problems.

Currently 78.8% of the constituents in the S&P 500 exhibit a bullish point and figure pattern. This is a very elevated level and is greater than one full standard deviation (76.8%) above the mean. While this measure alone doesn’t predict a coming sell-off, it can signify at the very least a stalling period for the index.


On the weekly SPX chart, there are many similarities to the daily. RSI (5) and Stochastics are overbought and it seems we are hitting resistance on the RSI (14). The downtrend remains in place and the MACD line is still trending lower. On the MACD histogram, this recent run has been quite sharp bringing the moving average differential to nearly two standard deviations from the mean. Similar to the daily chart, failure to break this trend could spell trouble ahead.


On the monthly SPX chart things seem to be improving but we are not in the clear just yet. We briefly broke the RSI (14) to the downside as we have done in the previous two bear markets but we were quick to recover the 50 level and hold it. That is a good sign. It would have been good to see the March rally on stronger volume.  The RSI (14) is still trending lower so we need to see a strong market from these levels to break the downtrend. The MACD signal cross is still negative as it was in the previous two bear markets but negative momentum seems to be waning.
We included the Fibonacci levels from the 2009 bottom. A further breakdown in the economic, fundamental and technical picture we believe can knock the S&P 500 back down to the 1600 level. 
We had written our views in the past. We expected a continued sell-off going into the first quarter. We then pivoted and thought we could have a strong reflex rally to end the quarter. That call proved to be correct although my execution of the forecast was terrible. We though the market would ultimately rally back to its 20MMA and continue downward from there. We are at that critical juncture now. We are not clairvoyant in our investment thesis. We are not trying to predict the future (I tried that last month and took losses in the portfolio). We are simply trying to position ourselves for probable outcomes.


When panic emerges, prices sell-off sharply associated with elevated volume levels and a swelling VIX, we will pivot to the short side. If this event doesn’t happen and we rally through the summer we will maintain our core portfolio positions. That’s our plan.
Corporate Earnings
We are entering earnings season. I read the most recent earnings report from factSet and they highlighted some interesting earnings adjustments. As we all know, sell-side analysts always start the year overly optimistic and reduce forecasts as the year progresses. That said the rate of change in these downward revisions have been excessive. They write, “During the first quarter, analysts lowered earnings estimates for companies in the S&P 500 for the quarter. The Q1 bottom-up  EPS  estimate  (which  is  an  aggregation  of the  estimates  for  all  the  companies  in  the  index)  dropped  by 9.6%  (to  $26.32  from  $29.13)  during  this  period.
During  the  past  year  (4  quarters),  the  average decline  in  the  bottom-up  EPS  estimate  during  a  quarter has  been 4.4%. During the past five years (20 quarters), the average decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate during a quarter has been 4.0%. During the past ten years, (40 quarters), the average decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate during a quarter has been 5.3%. Thus, the decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate recorded during the first quarter was larger than the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year averages.
In  fact,  this  was  the  largest  percentage  decline  in the  bottom-up  EPS  estimate  during  a  quarter  since Q1  2009 (-26.9%). “
Much of these downward revisions are coming from the messages sent through the 1Q16 pre-announcement period. Once again FactSet goes on to note, “At this point in time, 121 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q1 2016. Of these 121 companies, 94 have issued negative EPS guidance and 27 have issued positive EPS guidance. If 94 is the final number for the quarter, it will mark the second highest number of S&P 500 companies issuing negative EPS guidance for a quarter since FactSet began tracking the data in 2006. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 78% (94 out of 121), which is above the 5-year average of 73%.”
We tend to look at the twelve month forward EPS estimate for the S&P 500. According to Bloomberg estimates, the twelve month forward EPS estimate for the S&P 500 is $123.09. Taking into account S&P 500 cash flow per share of $188.97 and book value per share of $736.38 we still find the S&P 500 overvalued by some 15%. Just reverting to the mean based on today’s figures justifies $1760 to $1770 for the S&P 500. If it drops below the mean (as is usually the case) our mark of 1600 isn’t all that far-fetched. Attempting to trade based solely on fundamental analysis is difficult and in most cases the market will stay at elevated valuation levels for quite some time. It is a useful exercise though when looking at earnings trends.


In a recent post of ours we noted the importance of the rate of change in the twelve month forward earnings forecasts. In the post we wrote, “This is an important point because the direction of earnings forecasts have a fairly tight correlation with the direction of equities so the one month slope of the earnings forecast line is useful to watch. Bear in mind forecasted earnings are a reactionary lagging indicator so by the time you actually pick up a negative reading in the slope of earnings, the market has already given up a lion’s share of its gains and you’ll be a day late and a dollar short.
Tracking the rate of change in this figure has some use though. The slope of the line has a natural tendency to be positive (as does the stock market) so by tracking the rate of change, we could get a warning even if the slope of the trend is positive but decelerating. This may lead to a bit of noise and false readings but we look at it as a “head’s up” for potential problems. The chart below shows a z-score for the one month slope of twelve month forward forecasts going back twenty years.”
As can be seen in the chart below, the rate of change in the twelve month earnings forecast for the S&P 500 hasn’t been all that great.


“When the z-score falls below zero, it indicates decelerating or negative slope and should be used as a warning signal. If the figure recovers quickly then we breathe a sigh of relief and move on with our investment and trading thesis. But once that line continues lower to around -1 standard deviation, bad things happen in the market. The ultimate story here is that we definitely need earnings and revenues to improve dramatically in 2016 to justify a continued bull market.” 
We have also been tracking profit margins. “It appears we are seeing a continuation of earnings being produced on fewer revenues. We have spoken about the mean reverting nature of profit margins.
The figure below shows what happened to the S&P 500 the last two times profit margins started to roll over.”
Perhaps with greatly reduced earnings expectations and a weaker U.S. dollar we could be in store for an earnings season with large beats but ultimately the revenue and earnings picture needs to improve in order for the market to continue to climb.


Bottom Line: We understand we are at a critical juncture on the stock market at these levels. Improving economic and corporate earnings can propel the market to new highs. That said we understand the risks associated with this latest rally. The global economy continues to be tepid at best, as is seen from the lack of confidence exhibited by the worlds Central Bankers, the corporate earnings and revenue data don’t appear all that strong and the technical picture is at key turning point levels. We are maintaining our core long positions at this time but will put hedges in place and take a short directional bias at the first sign of trouble. As a sign of trouble we will look for a catalyst driven sharp sell-off on big volume.
Until next time, happy trading.
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
Email: joe@squaredconcept.com
Twitter: @jskalinowski
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JoeKalinowskiCFA/
Blog: http://squaredconcept.blogspot.com/
 
 
No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written permission of Squared Concept Partners, LLC.  Any information presented in this report is for informational purposes only.  All opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice.  Squared Concept Partners, LLC is an independent asset management and consulting company. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies discussed.  In some cases, these positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular report. 
The above information should not be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein.  The publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information.  The owners of Squared Concept Partners, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s research ideas.  They also may hold positions contrary to the ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.
This analysis should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for the readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written without consideration to the readers’ risk and return profile nor has the readers’ liquidity needs, time horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences been taken into account. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.