Late
last week, Mario Draghi, head of the European Central Bank set forth his
proposal as it relates to sovereign debt purchases by the ECB. These “outright
monetary transactions” (OMT) as he called them will be implemented in order to
drive down the cost of capital for those European nations struggling to meet
their budgetary needs.
The
announcement by Draghi appeared to have a desirable outcome as global equities
rallied quite aggressively and bond yields for both Spain and Italy fell to 5
month lows.
While
the move appears to have bought some time, it certainly is no panacea and after
further inspection, carries certain faults that would accelerate the crisis in
Southern Europe.
More
on that later, for now, let’s reiterate what was done and how it will be put in
to effect.
The
ECB announced that it is willing to step in to the open market and purchase
shorter-term sovereign debt to prevent excessive cost of capital for those
European nations in a bit of trouble. The hope is to buy them time by keeping
costs in line while fiscal reform in conceived and implemented on a country
level.
There
are certain items to this deal that should be brought to light.
First,
the ECB has stated that in order to qualify for this bond buying strategy,
stiff and strict conditions will need to be met and maintained. These
conditions will most likely include new austerity measures and some fiscal
discipline.
Second,
the ECB went out on a limb to articulate their “unlimited” effort in purchasing
these bonds.
Third,
he stated that the ECB will not take a priority claim over the private sector
in the case of a default or re-work. They have also lowered collateral
requirements and will accept less than stellar collateral for these purchases.
Lastly,
they claim that these purchases will be “sterilized”. Our translation is that
whatever money is pumped into the system through these purchases will be
equally offset by pulling money out of the euro-zone elsewhere. This is being
done to address inflationary concerns that typically follow aggressive monetary
expansion.
Problems
with the Plan
We
see inherent flaws in this plan that give us pause about buying into the stock
market rally. While we are never one to “fight the tape” or bet against a
trend, it is our opinion that the market may have overreacted to this initial
announcement.
To
address the first point of conditionality, the ECB has made it clear that any
nation seeking “help” with their cost of capital needs to formally request it
and then adhere to a strict austerity plan set forth. This is a problem in and
of itself in that there is no way any European nation is going to seek this
help unless their economy is starting to crumble around them and there is
absolutely no other options. Reading the Financial Times on 9/7/12, there was
an article that stated “Spain will not be forced into requesting a rescue until
the attached conditions become crystal clear…setting the stage for a prolonged
stand-off between the government of Mariano Rajoy and European authorities.”
Taken
from the same article, the ECB reiterated, “any assistance from the central
bank to reduce Spanish borrowing costs would come with “strict and effective”
conditionality, the Rajoy government remained steadfast that a request would be
made only if, and when, it was ready.”
One
needs to consider that Italian sentiment is even firmer given their size and
importance to the euro-zone. Thus the stand-off continues as southern European
nations refuse to surrender fiscal sovereignty and political leaders avoid
electoral defeat in return for help from the ECB. Only under the most extreme
circumstances will these nations ask for help, and given the moral hazard
infused into the bond market driving yields lower, why would they ask for help
now?
Bottom
Line: For this plan to be accepted, we need a major fiscal disaster to arise in
Europe. This is hardly a reason to bid up stocks in our opinion. We expect
tough negotiations later this month will destabilize the stock and bond
markets.
In
regards to the second item of unlimited purchases, this is very dangerous
language for the ECB because it commits them to potentially trillions of euros
in bond purchases that would ultimately wreak havoc on their balance sheet OR go
back on this unlimited promise and wreak havoc on their credibility. Either
outcome will have an undesirable effect on the global markets and may even
threaten the euro experiment.
Additionally,
let’s say we are a year into this new bond buying effort and one European
nation determines the austerity rules are too difficult to achieve and
indicates to the ECB that they need to restructure their initial conditions
agreement. What will the ECB do at that point? Pull the plug on the bond buying
initiative mid-way through and ensure a sovereign debt default that will ruin
their balance sheet and destroy the euro?
Bottom
Line: Once the ECB starts to purchase bonds in the open market, they will
become an “enabler” and provide a false sense of security to market
participants and European leaders. This is the danger of moral hazard.
Another
question as it relates to the sterilization of new bond purchases remains will
this action hurt a European economy that is already in recession. The debate
continues as to the effectiveness of government spending and economic growth.
In smaller European nations such as Ireland, Greece and Portugal, many
economist blame superfluous austerity measures as the reason these nations have
fallen deeper into recession. Thus the question needs to be asked, if the ECB
funds budgetary shortfalls for a specific nation but commands intrusive
anti-growth austerity measures while simultaneously sterilizing that money by
removing it from another part of the European economy will this action push the
euro-zone further into recession?
Bottom
Line: Market participants were quite pleased with the decision stemming from
the ECB, but on further analysis this plan may turn out to be a pig in a poke.
This
week in Europe
We
will have continued data flow out of Europe this week. On Thursday, Germany’s
constitutional court will be ruling on the legality of a permanent financial
rescue fund. While recent legal polls show a low probability of an unfavorable
ruling, should the court rule against the legality of the rescue fund, it will
be chaos in the financial markets. Most likely it will be a favorable ruling
with caveats, probably related to the conditionality outlined by Draghi last
week.
Also
on Thursday the European commission will continue to provide insight into a
euro-zone banking union. This will undoubtedly be a herculean task given the
6000 banks that make up the European banking system (although 95% of banking
assets are held at 200 banks).
-
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
JSK Partners of New York,
LLC
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
T (212) 537-0462
T (800) 618-1120
F (800) 618-1120
T (800) 618-1120
F (800) 618-1120
www.jsk-partners.com
No part of this report may be reproduced
in any manner without the expressed written permission of JSK
Partners of New York, LLC. Any information presented in this report is
for informational purposes only. All
opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice. JSK Partners of New York, LLC have proprietary accounts and funds under
management. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present
or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies
discussed. In some cases, these
positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular
report. The above information should not
be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein. The publisher of this report cannot verify
the accuracy of this information. The
owners of JSK Partners of New York, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be
conducting trades based on the firm's research ideas. They also may hold positions contrary to the
ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.
No comments:
Post a Comment