In last week’s notes, we outlined the extreme sentiment that
has propelled the market higher (Market
Sentiment Gaining Momentum) and mentioned several reasons why we believe
the market could go higher from here (Investment
Thesis for 2017).
The problem we now face is deploying new assets at the appropriate levels. At this time, we are not
chasing the market during the latest advance and will wait for a pull-back /
correction. The chart below is the S&P 500 on a daily basis. There is a
clear upward channel that started about a year ago and we are testing the upper
boundary currently. All of the oscillators that we track (RSI 5 and 14 as well
as Stochastics) for the index are not confirming the recent highs and are
showing a bit of a bearish divergence.
Volume on the latest upward move is declining and the
bearish MACD cross remains intact. Companies in the index that are trading
above their 50 and 200-day moving averages are diverging from price action as
well. This ties in with the S&P 500 equal weight ETF that has flatlined as
the general index accelerated.
The percent of companies in the index exhibiting bullish
P&F patterns has topped out and new highs vs. new lows barely moved the
needle on Friday’s rally.
This points to waning participation and may be
setting up for a pullback that could offer a better market entry for those
wishing to allocate new assets.
Additional clues come from a recent report through StockCharts.com.
They write, “The chart below shows the
S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) with three breadth indicators for the S&P 1500: the
10-day EMA of AD% ($SUPADP), High-Low%($SUPHLP) and %Above 200-day EMA
(@GT200SUP). The latter (@GT200SUP) is a user-defined index created using data
from !GT200SPX, !GT200MID and !GT200SML. You can read more about these
indicators in these three articles: AD Percent, High-Low Percent, and %Above
200-day EMA. The indicators have been net bullish since March 31st (2 of
3 with bull signals).”
“First and foremost, these
breadth indicators triggered bullish signals in March and remain bullish
overall. Despite a bullish market environment, I am seeing signs of less
strength as the market pushes to new highs. The S&P 500 SPDR and S&P
MidCap SPDR moved to new highs this week, but the S&P SmallCap iShares
remains just short of a new high. New highs in two of these three is clearly
more bullish than bearish. Even so, the 10-day EMA of AD Percent has yet to
clear +20% this year and High-Low Percent has yet to clear +15%. This is not
outright bearish, but it does point to less participation on the last push
higher. The %Above 200-day EMA remains strong and well above 70%. A move below
70% could signal the start of a correction within this bull market.”
Looking at the chart below, the VIX is near extreme lows.
This usually correlates fairly closely to a weakening or stagnant market.
IF we were to see
the market pullback or correct from here there are a few key levels to watch
for. Again from StockCharts.com,
“Timing or predicting a pullback within a
bigger uptrend is tricky business because the uptrend is the dominant force.
Ideally, I prefer to wait for pullbacks and use these as opportunities to
partake in the bigger uptrend. We can expect 2 to 4 decent pullbacks (5-10%) in
any given year. Just because the market is due for a pullback, however, does
not mean it will happen. We will get a pullback at some point, I just don't
know when (nobody does!).
The chart below shows
the S&P 500 with the 5% Zigzag as the blue dotted line. The last 5+ percent
pullback, on a closing basis, was in June. The August-November pullback was
just short of 5%, but still a decent correction. Thus, it has not been that long
since a correction. Should we get a 5% pullback from current levels, the
S&P 500 would correct to the 2185 area. This would mark a 50-61.38%
retracement of the November-January advance and a return to broken resistance.
This is the area to watch if/when we do get a pullback.”
On the weekly S&P 500 chart it appears obvious that the
uptrend remains intact but extended somewhat. We’re seeing breadth falling
short of pricing action similar to the daily chart. Other key levels to watch
are 2150 (bottom of the upward channel); 2140 (50-week moving average); 2135
(roughly the breakout level from two years of consolidation) and 2120 (which is
the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement from the February 2016 lows).
We discussed last week why we believed the economy would
avoid a recession and the bull market would continue in 2017 so we are
comfortable buying the dip near these entry points should they occur. These
figures would represent a 5% to 8% pullback.
Additional insight on market support levels comes from Lance
Roberts at Real
Investment Advice. He notes, “A “buyable
correction” would suggest a correction back to recent support levels that keep
the overall “bullish trend” intact.
The chart
below shows the recent advance of the market has gotten to extremely
overbought conditions on a short-term basis and the ‘sell signal’ noted at
the top of the chart, combined with the extreme overbought condition at the
bottom, suggest a potential correction could take the market back to 2200.
Also, note the negative divergence of the PMO oscillator despite the advance in
the market.
While such a
correction would be relatively minor in the short-term, it would also violate
the bullish uptrend that has held since the 2016 lows.
However, putting this
into an actual loss perspective, the following chart details specific support
levels back to the psychological level of 2000. A violation of the 2000 level
and we are going to start discussing the potential for a more severe market
correction.”
“A violation of
initial support level sets up corrections of 4.9%, 6.6%, 8.6% and 13.2% from
the recent highs. With bullishness running at highs, and cash allocations at
lows, the risk of a short-term reversal is high.”
There is a little bit of history that supports our February
lull. According to Almanac
Trader, February is usually the worst performing month for the market post-election
years. They write, “February’s
post-election year performance since 1950 is miserable, ranking dead last for
S&P 500, NASDAQ, Russell 1000 and Russell 2000. Average losses have been
sizable: -1.8%, -3.9%, -1.9%, and -2.0% respectively. February is eleventh for
DJIA with an average loss of 1.4%. February 2001 and 2009 were exceptionally
brutal.”
Also from Almanac
Trader, “In the [below] chart, the
average S&P 500 performance during new presidents first 100 days in office
is plotted. Only Democrats, only Republicans, both parties and the Trump
administrations (through today’s close) are compared.
At the end of the
first 100 days, new Democrats were accompanied by the greatest average S&P
500 gains. However, regardless of party,
S&P 500 did reach an early February peak before moving lower through the
balance of the month. S&P 500 performance during President Trump’s first
week in office has been above average when compared to past Republican
administrations, but is still lagging new Democrats.” [emphasis added]
Bottom Line: Our
bullish thesis remains intact. We are expecting a pullback in the market over
the next several days and weeks in which we will be deploying new assets in the
US equity markets.
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
Email: joe@squaredconcept.net
Twitter: @jskalinowski
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JoeKalinowskiCFA/
Blog: http://squaredconcept.blogspot.com/
No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner
without the expressed written permission of Squared Concept Asset Management,
LLC. Any information presented in this report is for informational
purposes only. All opinions expressed in this report are subject to
change without notice. Squared Concept Asset Management, LLC is a
Registered Investment Advisory and consulting company. These entities may have
had in the past or may have in the present or future long or short positions,
or own options on the companies discussed. In some cases, these positions
may have been established prior to the writing of the report.
The above information should not be construed as a
solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein. The
publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information.
The owners of Squared Concept Asset Management, LLC and its affiliated
companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s research
ideas. They also may hold positions contrary to the ideas presented in
the research as market conditions may warrant.
This analysis should not be considered investment advice and
may not be suitable for the readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written
without consideration to the readers’ risk and return profile nor has the
readers’ liquidity needs, time horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences
been considered. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other
instrument should be based upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past
performance is not indicative of future results.
No comments:
Post a Comment