Monday, December 12, 2016

Bullish Tactical Take - Improving Strategic Stance


Positive sentiment in back and the market is on the move. The chart below is the S&P 500 on a weekly basis. It would appear that we have broken out of a consolidation phase that has lasted two years and started on a new trend higher.


RSI (14), P&F percent bullish, percent of stocks above their 50DMA and 200DMA all have room for additional upside as they are not yet at extreme over-bought conditions. There was also a recent MACD bullish cross. Given the rise of “animal spirits” and the seasonally strong time of year for equities we are fully invested and remain so at least until the end of the year.
Sentiment indicators are confirming our tactical outlook. University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index rose to 98 last week, the highest it’s been since January 2015.
The Sabrient Insider Sentiment Index is an equal- dollar weighted index comprising publicly-traded companies that reflect positive sentiment among those 'insiders' closest to a company's financials & business prospects (top management, directors, analysts). This index recently sprung to a new high but year-over-year is only up 15%. This is far from an overly euphoric number (30% - 40%) that indicated excessive insider optimism.

The shift in sentiment can be seen in many indices. From IBD, “The IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index surged to a 10-year high in December, as confidence in the outlook got a jolt from the presidential election and the subsequent stock-market rally.
Economic Optimism rose 3.4 points to 54.8, the highest since November 2006, remaining above the neutral 50 level for the third straight month.”
Anything above the 50 level is economic optimism.
From Merrill Lynch (via Calculated Risk), “Anecdotes and surveys suggest that business and consumer confidence has improved following the election. The gain in animal spirits could amplify the boost to the economy from fiscal stimulus, creating upside risk to our forecast. We will have to wait for the "hard data" from November and December to have clarity on the timing and magnitude.”
From Wells Fargo (also via Calculated Risk), “Small business owners are feeling much more optimistic about the prospects for the economy and their business in the coming year. The latest Wells Fargo/Gallup Small Business Index, which was conducted from Nov. 11 to Nov. 17, jumped 12 points to 80 from the previous quarter and is up 26 points over the past year. Small business optimism is now at its highest level since January 2008, when the index was coming down as the economy slid into recession. The latest reading marks the largest quarterly increase in a little over a year and is one of the largest quarterly gains in the series’ history.
While political factors likely influenced the magnitude of the improvement in small business confidence, business owners’ attitudes about the economy and their business have been gradually improving for the past few years. All of the improvement in the most recent quarter, however, came from the expectations series, which jumped 17 points in the fourth quarter. The present situation index fell 5 points, essentially reversing the prior quarter’s gain.”

Dow Theory Buy Signal
Cam Hui from Humble Student of the Markets and Jeff Hirsch of Almanac Trader both pointed out that both the Dow Industrials and Transports are hitting new highs, thus confirming the current break-out. From Jeff Hirsch, “Well it looks like the Dow Transports just issued a Dow Theory Buy signal by breaking out to a new high on today’s close. The Dow Theory Sell Signal we discussed on January 6 of this year was followed by a further decline of -7.4% on the Dow Jones Industrials.
The current post-election bullish rally looks like it’s got more legs and that further confirms our Best Six Months Seasonal MACD Buy Signal from October 24 and our recent call last week for further gains, based on our bullish scenario for Trump and his new team of policy makers to deliver stimulus, tax cuts, slow rising rates and healthy inflation.”
VIX and Complacency
The VIX is back down under $12 indicating a healthy dose of complacency in the market.
While this is a cautionary sign that the market may be prone to a pull-back, there are a few reasons why I don’t believe this to be the case, at least through the end of the year. The first of course is the new wave of sentiment that is building. This optimism could drive the market higher for the next few weeks or months at least. Additionally, many asset managers (including myself) will use this opportunity to boost their annual returns by trading this rally. That will be fuel for the rally. From Dana Lyons’ Tumblr, “From jacked-up surveys to record ETF inflows, it’s probably safer to conclude that folks are pretty enthusiastic about stocks right now. One specific example comes from the National Association of Active Investment Managers (NAAIM) survey of active manager equity exposure. This week, based on the survey, these active managers have an average of 101.6% exposure to equities. I’d say that’s pretty high.”
“Now, don’t go and sell all of your stocks just yet based on a contrarian analysis of this data point. That’s because the previous “all in” bets by these managers didn’t exactly lead to disastrous results.”
“In fact, on a 3-week, 1-month and 6-month basis, the S&P 500 was higher each time following these >100% readings. And only this past July’s reading led to a negative 3-month return, barely.”
Barron’s pointed out this weekend, “While stocks look overbought in the short term, with three of four stocks already stretching above their 50-day averages, the bullish throng won’t thin now – not when selling after Jan. 1 lets you put off paying capital gains until April 2018, when tax rates just might be lower.”
Thus, the complacency in the VIX number doesn’t mean we should immediately start taking profits. From Dana Lyons’ Tumblr, “what do stocks do after very subdued VIX readings in early December? Specifically, we looked at occasions when the VIX made a 3-month low, as it did today, during the first 18 days of December. While December has generally been a strong month, it has also not been immune to some adversity during the middle part of the month. Therefore, our expectation was that stocks had perhaps struggled following historical occurrences – if not through year-end, at least intra-month. That has not been the case.”
“Since the inception of the VIX in 1986, today marked the 30th time that it hit a 3-month low during the first part of December. Of the prior 29, 27 showed a positive return in the S&P 500 from that date into year-end, with a median return of +0.95%. Even the median drawdown until year-end was very contained, at -0.23%, with just one date seeing a drawdown before year-end of more than -2%.”
The shift in sentiment can absolutely be a powerful yet frustrating event that has the ability to defy even the soundest of analyses. We came across this  article that highlights the power and frustration of market sentiment.
From Business Insider speaking about Albert Edwards of Societe Generale, “Historically, according to Edwards, there has been a close relationship between the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index — which hit an all-time high after Sunday's Italian referendum — and credit spreads (using a mix of US, UK, and euro corporate bonds against their benchmarks): In times of higher uncertainty, global credit spreads have gone up.
Edwards noted that that this relationship, however had been much weaker recently than in the past. Put simply, the debt market hasn't seen a lot of selling or instability even though the outlook for global policy is murkier than it has been in over a decade.
Edwards included commentary from Guy Stear, SocGen's head of emerging markets and credit research. From the note:
"In 2008 and 2011, the correlation between economic policy uncertainty and credit spreads was very close. As uncertainty rose, so did spreads, but something different is happening now. The EPU index is up at all-time highs, but spreads are at the median levels of the period going back to 2008. The chart implies that given the current level of economic policy uncertainty, global spreads should be twice as wide. This ought to worry the bulls."”
“In Edwards' opinion, the credit market is too Pollyannaish. There's the possibility the European Union could break up after the Brexit vote and the Italian referendum, and the election of Trump as US president could bring about either a trade war or a corporate boon. Instead of discounting this risk, Edwards said, the market seems to be simply ignoring it. From Edwards' commentary (emphasis ours):
"Markets shrugged off the Brexit vote in a couple of days. They shrugged off Donald Trump's election in a single day. They shrugged off the Italian Referendum result in a couple of hours. Heck, in this mood they would shrug off an alien invasion of planet Earth. But global political risk is now at such elevated levels that investors must surely be on another planet."
The strategist noted that he had long been worried about the sheer amount of corporate debt floating around. He said, in fact, that the relationship between junk-bond spreads and the amount of debt showed how the credit market had lost touch with reality.
"It is not just the levels of political uncertainty that suggest corporate yields should be considerably above current levels," Edwards wrote. "Normally at this level of corporate debt accumulation, investors have begun throwing their toys out of the pram."”
Long Term Chart
Last year we had gone on alert for the next bear market. The chart below shows how we look at the S&P 500 in a technical way to develop our strategic positioning. On the monthly chart we look for a bearish MACD cross that triggers our warning. From there we look for RSI (14) to break below 50 with the stock falling through the 20-month moving average. Once the 20-month moving average starts sloping negative and the index tests the moving average as resistance and fails…we get out of the market and/or start trading from the short side.
Additionally, we look for the slope in 12-month forward S&P 500 earnings forecasts to start sloping negative. We got that signal in early 2015, coinciding with our technical warning. Earnings did improve somewhat over the next year but took a turn for the worse at the start of 2016 (similar to the 2000 bear market).

Lastly we watch the yield curve for a flattening or inverting of the two and ten year treasury yield. While we didn’t get an inverted yield curve we did experience substantial flattening over the last few years. Given the extreme monetary policies in place we were willing to relax the rule of the inverted yield curve as recessions and bear markets have occurred without an inverted yield curve.
Japan has had five recessions without an inverted yield curve and the US has had six recessions without an inverted yield curve. A common theme among these non-inverted yield curve recessions is that they occurred when underlying rates were low. Central banks have greater power to prevent an inverted curve. We can see today in newly formulated monetary policy agendas in Japan and Europe in which the BOJ and the ECB are attempting to control the steepness of the yield curve.  
We hit most of these conditions starting in 2015 and we have certainly been trading with a defensive posture. In early 2016, we received almost all of our signals for the next correction. We started anticipating a weaker market and we turned out to be wrong. Our returns in March and April of this year underperformed the market as a result.
Our view of the future market activity is still cautious but we are no longer under full bear market alert. On the technical side, RSI (14) is back above 50, the slope of the 20-month moving average is positive again and the index is trading above that level. Probably most importantly we received a bullish MACD cross. Given the new break out from the two-year consolidation we have removed the alert and are now searching for clues of a further “melt up” technically.
The slope of the 12-month EPS consensus has turned positive once again as the earnings recession appears to have ended. Indeed the cut in corporate tax rates proposed by the incoming Trump administration will help earnings per share in our view. In a recent analysis by S&P Global Market Intelligence, they estimated that for every 1% reduction in the corporate tax rate will equate to roughly a 1% increase in corporate earnings. Thus if the Trump administration cuts the tax rate from 35% down to 15%, the current 12-month forward EPS figure for the S&P 500, currently around $131 per share could conceivably jump to $157 per share.  Additionally lowering the repatriation tax to allow US companies to bring in their cash from international holdings would spur additional rounds of share repurchases. This could have a profound impact on equity prices.
The yield curve has steepened since the election as investor deem a business friendly, lower taxes, less regulation, stronger fiscal policy administration to be economically beneficial. Richard Bernstein recently wrote, “The slope of the yield curve is one of the most reliable indicators of future nominal growth. Steeper curves forecast faster nominal growth, flatter yield curves forecast slower growth, and inverted yield curves forecast recession.
Global yield curves are steepening, which supports the forecasts of global leading indicators. Chart 7 shows the percentage of global yield curves that are inverted (i.e., forecasting a recession). In 2008, 41% of global yield curves were inverted. Currently, it is only 2%.  The US yield curve, for example, has been steepening for 5 months.
Steepening global yield curves imply that most investors’ asset allocations are inappropriate, and are too defensively positioned.”
As market technicals improve, corporate earnings accelerate and the yield curve steepens while monetary policy becomes more normalized, the economic policies of the Trump administration could propel the economy and stock prices.
Richard Berstein points out that the global economies are already moving in the right direction. “The global economy might still be in secular stagnation (although we are increasingly doubtful), but cyclical acceleration is clearly underway. Leading economic indicators (LEIs) around the world are strengthening in a unified manner that hasn’t existed since the credit bubble.
Chart 6 shows the relationship between the current global LEIs to those of three months ago. If a country lies above the diagonal line in the chart, then the rate of change in that country’s LEI is stronger than it was three months ago. If a country is below the line, then the rate of change is deteriorating. Most LEIs are improving in unison, which indicates broad improvement in the global economy and an increasing chance of rising interest rates over the next year or so.”
This trend could possibly accelerate as perception becomes reality. Michelle Meyer, chief US economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch (via Business Insider) states, “"The data clearly show that consumers, investors, and business CEOs have all become more optimistic since the election," Meyer wrote in a note to clients on Thursday.
Things such as regional manufacturing indexes, consumer confidence surveys, and investor sentiment have ticked up since November 8. The only survey that has slid is the ISM-adjusted Empire Manufacturing Survey, which measures the confidence of manufacturers in New York state.
"Bottom line: Most business activity surveys point to greater confidence following the election," Meyer wrote.”
“This sort of upswing in confidence usually starts to show up outside of surveys and in real data in a short amount of time, according to Meyer's analysis. The increases in business indexes usually point to an increase in capital expenditures, while the consumer confidence indicators can predict consumer spending.”

“Some of the correlations are weaker than others, Meyer said, but directionally they point to higher output for the US economy.

"Overall, we see a significant relationship between surveys and actual output, but we would be careful given lags and historical episodes with misleading signals," Meyer wrote.”

We will be watching the data closely.

Bottom Line: In the short-term we are fully deployed and believe this “Trump rally” can last through January. Longer-term, we have exited our cautionary stance on the market and are reconfiguring the portfolio to tilt more towards GARP (growth at a reasonable price) strategy, away from an overly defensive posture.


Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA




Twitter: @jskalinowski

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JoeKalinowskiCFA/

Blog: http://squaredconcept.blogspot.com/

Web Site: http://www.squaredconcept.net/







No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written permission of Squared Concept Asset Management, LLC.  Any information presented in this report is for informational purposes only.  All opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice.  Squared Concept Asset Management, LLC is a Registered Investment Advisory and consulting company. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies discussed.  In some cases, these positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular report. 

The above information should not be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein.  The publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information.  The owners of Squared Concept Asset Management, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s research ideas.  They also may hold positions contrary to the ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.

This analysis should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for the readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written without consideration to the readers’ risk and return profile nor has the readers’ liquidity needs, time horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences been taken into account. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

No comments:

Post a Comment