I’ll start this blog off with a few announcements. Squared
Concept is officially a Registered Investment Advisory firm. Our goal is to
work with other RIA’s, family offices and advisors to offer our products as a
compliment to their existing strategies. We are working with a marketing firm
now to fine tune our message and we will have an update on that soon. As such,
we have new compliance requirements that must be upheld including incorporating
this blog site into our procedures. Over the next few weeks we will have a new
look and feel to this site so please stay tuned.
I am also studying for the Charted Market Technician level I
exam at the end of this month. So between our compliance review and the
studying this month will probably be a bit lean on the postings. We will be up
and running full time shortly though.
1Q16 Portfolio
Results.
We finished the first quarter down -0.9%. We underperformed
the S&P 500 which finished the quarter up 1.3% but edged out the Nasdaq
Comp which was lower by -2.4%. Since inception (July 2015) we are up 19.4% vs.
-1.1% for the S&P 500. We are also beating the Nasdaq Comp which is down
-4.9% since July.
January and February were strong months for us as we were
prepared for the sell-off and subsequent rebound and were on the right side of
the tape for most of the first two months of the year. March proved quite
challenging as we started to fade the rally way too early. Upon the statements
made by Mario Draghi at the ECB the market rally and subsequent sell-off later
that day swayed us to close our long bias and start building positions counter
to the bullish rally. Later in the month Janet Yellen added fuel to the bullish
run by coming out much more dovish than we expected. The market ran further and
by this time we were behind the eight ball with nothing more to do than stem
our losses for the month.
In the future we will wait for additional confirmation of
the trend before scaling in. Case in point, the brief sell-offs that we were
watching happened with very little volume and not enough panic. Outside of
Central Banking activity there were no major catalysts to warrant a greater
sell-off i.e. oil prices hitting new lows, Chinese market turmoil or a European
debt crisis. U.S. economic data was also improving a bit. We will also be more
measured in our approach to building positions so as not to be too overexposed
at the beginning of a perceived trend change. The stock market is forever a
humbling experience and we are always learning from it.
Bulls on Parade
The bulls still seem to be in control. We will continue to
stay exposed to the long side of the market until such time that the supply /
demand dynamic shifts. Even Friday, with the markets dropping in the morning
the bulls came out to rally on the day.
That said we are still concerned by the current levels and
are preparing for another pullback in the market. On the SPX daily chart RSI
and Stochastics are pointing to overbought levels. Like most oscillators with
finite bounds, they tend to break down in a strongly trending market so we have
been at these levels for quite some time. We will be watching for sharp
downward movements in the oscillators. We are also approaching the top of the
trend line since the market started reaching lower highs and lows. This is an
important level for us to watch. Failure to break this trend line to the upside
could bring a nasty sell-off. MACD momentum has been waning even as the market
has continued higher. This doesn’t bode well for the near term picture in our
opinion.
SPX equal weight has not been rallying with the index so it
seems we are back to the notion of the index being supported by a handful of
the largest companies in the index. This could lead to potential problems.
Currently 78.8% of the constituents in the S&P 500
exhibit a bullish point and figure pattern. This is a very elevated level and
is greater than one full standard deviation (76.8%) above the mean. While this
measure alone doesn’t predict a coming sell-off, it can signify at the very
least a stalling period for the index.
On the weekly SPX chart, there are many similarities to the
daily. RSI (5) and Stochastics are overbought and it seems we are hitting
resistance on the RSI (14). The downtrend remains in place and the MACD line is
still trending lower. On the MACD histogram, this recent run has been quite
sharp bringing the moving average differential to nearly two standard
deviations from the mean. Similar to the daily chart, failure to break this
trend could spell trouble ahead.
On the monthly SPX chart things seem to be improving but we
are not in the clear just yet. We briefly broke the RSI (14) to the downside as
we have done in the previous two bear markets but we were quick to recover the
50 level and hold it. That is a good sign. It would have been good to see the
March rally on stronger volume. The RSI
(14) is still trending lower so we need to see a strong market from these
levels to break the downtrend. The MACD signal cross is still negative as it
was in the previous two bear markets but negative momentum seems to be waning.
We included the Fibonacci levels from the 2009 bottom. A
further breakdown in the economic, fundamental and technical picture we believe
can knock the S&P 500 back down to the 1600 level.
We had written our views in the past. We expected a
continued sell-off going into the first quarter. We then pivoted and thought we
could have a strong reflex rally to end the quarter. That call proved to be
correct although my execution of the forecast was terrible. We though the market
would ultimately rally back to its 20MMA and continue downward from there. We
are at that critical juncture now. We are not clairvoyant in our investment
thesis. We are not trying to predict the future (I tried that last month and
took losses in the portfolio). We are simply trying to position ourselves for probable
outcomes.
When panic emerges, prices sell-off sharply associated with
elevated volume levels and a swelling VIX, we will pivot to the short side. If
this event doesn’t happen and we rally through the summer we will maintain our
core portfolio positions. That’s our plan.
Corporate Earnings
We are entering earnings season. I read the most recent
earnings report from factSet
and they highlighted some interesting earnings adjustments. As we all know,
sell-side analysts always start the year overly optimistic and reduce forecasts
as the year progresses. That said the rate of change in these downward
revisions have been excessive. They write, “During
the first quarter, analysts lowered earnings estimates for companies in the
S&P 500 for the quarter. The Q1 bottom-up
EPS estimate (which
is an aggregation
of the estimates for
all the companies
in the index)
dropped by 9.6% (to
$26.32 from $29.13)
during this period.
During the
past year (4
quarters), the average decline in
the bottom-up EPS
estimate during a
quarter has been 4.4%. During the
past five years (20 quarters), the average decline in the bottom-up EPS
estimate during a quarter has been 4.0%. During the past ten years, (40
quarters), the average decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate during a quarter
has been 5.3%. Thus, the decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate recorded during
the first quarter was larger than the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year averages.
In fact,
this was the
largest percentage decline
in the bottom-up EPS
estimate during a
quarter since Q1 2009 (-26.9%). “
Much of these downward revisions are coming from the
messages sent through the 1Q16 pre-announcement period. Once again FactSet goes
on to note, “At this point in time, 121
companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q1 2016. Of these 121
companies, 94 have issued negative EPS guidance and 27 have issued positive EPS
guidance. If 94 is the final number for the quarter, it will mark the second
highest number of S&P 500 companies issuing negative EPS guidance for a
quarter since FactSet began tracking the data in 2006. The percentage of
companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 78% (94 out of 121), which is above
the 5-year average of 73%.”
We tend to look at the twelve month forward EPS estimate for
the S&P 500. According to Bloomberg estimates, the twelve month forward EPS
estimate for the S&P 500 is $123.09. Taking into account S&P 500 cash
flow per share of $188.97 and book value per share of $736.38 we still find the
S&P 500 overvalued by some 15%. Just reverting to the mean based on today’s
figures justifies $1760 to $1770 for the S&P 500. If it drops below the
mean (as is usually the case) our mark of 1600 isn’t all that far-fetched.
Attempting to trade based solely on fundamental analysis is difficult and in
most cases the market will stay at elevated valuation levels for quite some
time. It is a useful exercise though when looking at earnings trends.
In a recent post of ours we noted the importance of the rate
of change in the twelve month forward earnings forecasts. In the post we wrote,
“This is an important point because the
direction of earnings forecasts have a fairly tight correlation with the
direction of equities so the one month slope of the earnings forecast line is
useful to watch. Bear in mind forecasted earnings are a reactionary lagging indicator
so by the time you actually pick up a negative reading in the slope of
earnings, the market has already given up a lion’s share of its gains and
you’ll be a day late and a dollar short.
Tracking the rate of
change in this figure has some use though. The slope of the line has a natural
tendency to be positive (as does the stock market) so by tracking the rate of
change, we could get a warning even if the slope of the trend is positive but
decelerating. This may lead to a bit of noise and false readings but we look at
it as a “head’s up” for potential problems. The chart below shows a z-score for
the one month slope of twelve month forward forecasts going back twenty years.”
As can be seen in the chart below, the rate of change in the
twelve month earnings forecast for the S&P 500 hasn’t been all that great.
“When the z-score
falls below zero, it indicates decelerating or negative slope and should be
used as a warning signal. If the figure recovers quickly then we breathe a sigh
of relief and move on with our investment and trading thesis. But once that
line continues lower to around -1 standard deviation, bad things happen in the
market. The ultimate story here is that we definitely need earnings and
revenues to improve dramatically in 2016 to justify a continued bull
market.”
We have also been tracking profit margins. “It appears we are seeing a continuation of
earnings being produced on fewer revenues. We have spoken about the mean
reverting nature of profit margins.
The figure below shows
what happened to the S&P 500 the last two times profit margins started to
roll over.”
Perhaps with greatly reduced earnings expectations and a
weaker U.S. dollar we could be in store for an earnings season with large beats
but ultimately the revenue and earnings picture needs to improve in order for
the market to continue to climb.
Bottom Line: We
understand we are at a critical juncture on the stock market at these levels.
Improving economic and corporate earnings can propel the market to new highs. That
said we understand the risks associated with this latest rally. The global
economy continues to be tepid at best, as is seen from the lack of confidence
exhibited by the worlds Central Bankers, the corporate earnings and revenue
data don’t appear all that strong and the technical picture is at key turning
point levels. We are maintaining our core long positions at this time but will
put hedges in place and take a short directional bias at the first sign of
trouble. As a sign of trouble we will look for a catalyst driven sharp sell-off
on big volume.
Until next time, happy trading.
Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
Email: joe@squaredconcept.com
Twitter: @jskalinowski
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JoeKalinowskiCFA/
Blog: http://squaredconcept.blogspot.com/
No part of
this report may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written
permission of Squared Concept Partners, LLC.
Any information presented in this report is for informational purposes
only. All opinions expressed in this
report are subject to change without notice.
Squared Concept Partners, LLC is an independent asset management and
consulting company. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the
present or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies discussed. In some cases, these positions may have been
established prior to the writing of the particular report.
The above
information should not be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the
securities discussed herein. The
publisher of this report cannot verify the accuracy of this information. The owners of Squared Concept Partners, LLC
and its affiliated companies may also be conducting trades based on the firm’s
research ideas. They also may hold
positions contrary to the ideas presented in the research as market conditions
may warrant.
This analysis
should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for the
readers’ portfolio. This analysis has been written without consideration to the
readers’ risk and return profile nor has the readers’ liquidity needs, time
horizon, tax circumstances or unique preferences been taken into account. Any
purchase or sale activity in any securities or other instrument should be based
upon the readers’ own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not
indicative of future results.
No comments:
Post a Comment