Note: This was written over the
week-end so events have been in constant flux. It seems there has been a delay
in Parliamentary voting on this issue.
As
we write this blog, we are seeing the terms of a new Cyprus banking bailout.
True the total annual output of the Cypriot economy is only 17 billion euros
representing just 0.2% of the combined eurozone economy. Granted their bailout
needs are much smaller (17 billion euros) compared to Greece (380 billion euros), Ireland (85 billion euros), Portugal (78
billion) and the Spanish bank bailout of 41 billion.
Yet
what completely blows my mind about this bailout is that Germany and the
ECB have proposed that the depositors in the Cypriot banking system cover some
of the cost.
The
DEPOSITORS!
Imagine
having to contribute up to 10% of your bank deposits towards the bailout of the
very banking system you trusted to keep your money safe.
This is somewhat
unprecedented.
I
immediately consulted with one of our partners that specialize in international
banking to confirm my understanding of the situation. It appears all banking
accounts under 100,000 euros will have 6.75% of the funds seized. Accounts over
100,000 euros will have 9.9% seized. And then the Eurozone's emergency lending
facility and the International Monetary Fund will inject the remaining amount
to keep the banks alive.
The
Cyprus
government will also have to hike corporate tax to 12.5 percent from 10 percent
and sell off state assets so as to help balance the public finances.
This
is an answer to the long standing problem that has defined the Cypriot banking
system as an offshore haven for nefarious Russian banking transactions.
By
bailing out the banking system, they will in essence hurt the undesirable
customers that have been a large part of their banking in the past. To quote
our partner, the ECB and Germany are using a defibrillator to resuscitate the
patient only to hit them over the head with a hammer.
European Bank Run
What
happens when other Europeans learn that their deposits may not be as safe as
initially conceived? Without knowing the true intentions of the ECB, on the
face of it many may say hey…I’d better get my assets out of the bank before
that happens to me. When large groups of individuals and institutions look to
withdraw at once, you get something that looks like the great depression or
2008.
“Other
depositors at weak banks all over Europe, in places like Spain, Italy,
and Greece,
will rightly wonder whether this is the beginning of a new era of bank
bailouts, an era in which bank depositors are going lose some of their money.
What
do you think those other depositors in Spain,
Italy, Greece, etc.,
are going to feel like doing when they realize that, if their banks ever need a
bailout, they might have their deposits seized?
That's
right.
They're
going to feel like yanking their money out of their banks.” - Henry Blodget,
Business Insider.
Arguments Against
Taken
from the Economist Schumpeter blog, they lay out the pitfalls quite eloquently
from these series of actions.
“Whatever
the rationale, it is a mistake for three reasons. The first error is to
reawaken contagion risk elsewhere in the euro zone. Depositors have come
through the financial crisis largely unscathed. Now they have been bailed in,
some of them in breach of an explicit promise that they can be sure of getting
their money back even if a bank goes belly-up.
Euro-zone
leaders will spin the deal as reflecting the unique circumstances surrounding Cyprus, just as
they did the Greek debt restructuring last year. But if you were a depositor in
a peripheral country that looked like it needed more money from the euro zone,
what would your calculation be? That you would never be treated like the people
in Cyprus,
or that a precedent had been set which reflected the consistent demands of
creditor countries for burden-sharing? The chances of big, destabilising
movements of money (into cash, if not into other banks) have just shot up.
The
second error is one of equity. There is an argument to be made over the
principles of bailing in uninsured depositors. And there is a case for hitting
everyone in Cypriot banks before any taxpayer in another country. But there is
no moral imperative for whacking Cypriot widows and leaving senior bank
bondholders untouched, as appears to be the case here; or not imposing any
losses on sovereign-debt investors in Cyprus; or protecting depositors in
the Greek operations of Cypriot banks, as has also happened. The euro zone may
cloak this bail-out in the language of fairness but it is a highly selective
treatment. Indeed, the euro zone’s insistence that this is a one-off makes that
perfectly plain: with enough foreigners at risk and a small enough country to
push around, you get an outcome like Cyprus. (That is one reason why
people are now wondering about the implications of this deal for little Latvia, also
home to lots of Russian money and itself due to join the euro zone in 2014.)
The
final error is strategic. The Cypriot deal has no coherence in the larger
context. The euro crisis has been in abeyance for a few months, thanks largely
to the readiness of the European Central Bank to intervene to help struggling
countries. The ECB’s price for helping countries is to insist they go into a
bail-out programme. The political price of going into a programme has just gone
up, so the ECB’s safety net looks a little thinner.”
Bottom Line: This
action taken by the Euro zone takes them down a slippery slope. Just as the
uncertainty stemming from European banking stability has taken a backseat, this
action has the potential to cause a flare-up of skittishness that will surely
provide a headwind for today’s stock market rally.
- Joseph S. Kalinowski, CFA
References
http://www.businessinsider.com/economist-slams-the-cyprus-bailout-2013-3
http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/03/cyprus-bail-out
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-risks-europe-bank-runs-2013-3#ixzz2NoZ66oWb
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-risks-europe-bank-runs-2013-3#ixzz2NoZkdSJp
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-deal-2013-3#ixzz2NoaGKgKh
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-deal-2013-3#ixzz2NoaRzMwY
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-russian-angle-2013-3
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-deal-2013-3
http://www.businessinsider.com/cyprus-bailout-statement-by-the-president-of-the-republic-mr-nicos-anastasiades-2013-3#ixzz2NoflyW6V
http://pawelmorski.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/cyprus-a-brutal-lesson-in-realpolitik-2/
JSK Partners of New York,
LLC
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
T (212) 537-0462
T (800) 618-1120
F (800) 618-1120
T (800) 618-1120
F (800) 618-1120
www.jsk-partners.com
No part of this report may be reproduced
in any manner without the expressed written permission of JSK
Partners of New York, LLC. Any information presented in this report is
for informational purposes only. All
opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice. JSK Partners of New York, LLC have proprietary accounts and funds under
management. These entities may have had in the past or may have in the present
or future long or short positions, or own options on the companies
discussed. In some cases, these
positions may have been established prior to the writing of the particular
report. The above information should not
be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed herein. The publisher of this report cannot verify
the accuracy of this information. The
owners of JSK Partners of New York, LLC and its affiliated companies may also be
conducting trades based on the firm's research ideas. They also may hold positions contrary to the
ideas presented in the research as market conditions may warrant.
No comments:
Post a Comment